Your service catalog is
already wrong.

Your AI agents are acting on it right now. NOFire AI derives your catalog from live production, so it reflects what is really running, not what someone declared six months ago.

NOFire.ai · Service Wiki
Service wiki
Generated from your environment · observed continuously
1 incident3 warning
Search by service name
CriticalityHealthOwner
⊞ List∿ Graph
frontend-proxywarning
TIER 2productionno owner1 gap
calls 6by 19deploy 1h ago
readiness88%
checkoutwarning
TIER 2productionbackend2 gaps
calls 9by 19deploy 6h ago
readiness44%
fraud-detectionincident
TIER 2productionno owner3 gaps
calls 3by 11deploy 5d ago
readiness31%
product-cataloghealthy
TIER 3productionbackend
calls 3by 14deploy 1d ago
readiness72%
paymenthealthy
TIER 3productionbackend
calls 1by 7deploy 3h ago
readiness90%
cartwarning
TIER 3qabackend2 gaps
calls 2by 8deploy 12h ago
readiness27%
18 services·sorted by criticality·last scan: 4s ago
Trusted by
LearnWorlds Adalat AI Pallma Ergeon Instacar HarborLab
Service catalog automation: why manual maintenance fails

Your catalog is always a step behind.

Backstage, Cortex, Compass, Roadie. Every catalog tool shares the same assumption: humans will keep it accurate. That assumption breaks by week two.

Stale by design

Catalog entries go out of date the moment a team restructures, a dependency shifts, or a new service ships. Nobody updates the YAML.

Incidents expose it

Your on-call rotation discovers the real service topology during the incident. The catalog was wrong. It always is.

Maintenance tax

Two to three engineers spend significant time keeping Backstage running: plugins, integrations, authentication, the catalog entries themselves.

Comparison

Why teams replace Backstage with NOFire AI.

Every tool in this table is a good product. The difference is the architecture: NOFire AI catalogs from observation. Every other tool catalogs from declaration.

CapabilityNOFire AIBackstageCortexCompass / Roadie
YAML requiredNoneYes, for every entityYes, service definitionsYes, via Backstage entities
Dependency provenanceEvery dependency labeled: runtime (observed) or inferred. Confidence score included.Declared in YAML, no confidence modelDeclared or integration-based, no provenanceDeclared, no provenance
Service ownershipObserved from deploys, on-call, and contributor historyManual YAML declarationManual + team policiesJira-linked teams, manual
Repository analysisAgents read README, CHANGELOG, CI/CD pipelines, contributor historyTechDocs, manual authoringGitHub integration, partialTechDocs via plugins, manual
Readiness scorecardScored from actual SLOs, alerts, and incident dataPlugin-based, manual data inputPolicy rules, manual inputJira-based metrics, manual
Change timelineAuto-populated from CI/CD and incident eventsNot built inVia integrations, partialVia Jira or plugins, partial
Dependency graphObserved from live telemetryYAML declarationPartial via integrationsPartial via plugins
Blast radiusCalculated from observed call graphNot availableNot availableNot available
Maintenance requiredNear zero: agents observe continuously2 to 3 engineers, ongoingModerate, ongoingLow (hosted), catalog still goes stale
Agent-powered

One panel. Every layer of service knowledge.

The service detail page in NOFire AI is populated entirely from what agents observe. Nothing is declared manually. Nothing goes stale.

Unlike Backstage, Cortex, and Compass, NOFire AI requires zero YAML, zero manual catalog entries, and zero plugin maintenance.

NOFire.ai · checkout · service detail
checkout
v24 · production
No SLO: No SLO / recording rule defined
Important · 1 gap
Overview

The checkout service orchestrates the end-to-end purchase flow, coordinating payment processing, inventory validation, and shipping arrangements. It acts as the central transaction coordinator, calling payment, product-catalog, cart, item validation, shipping, currency, email, kafka, and flagd.

Change timeline
deploya3f91cfeat: add circuit breaker for payment retriesm.chen
2h ago
hotfix7d204bfix: OOM crash at peak load (memory cap 20MB)p.moustafellos
4d ago
configc9e812chore: tune GC percent to reduce goroutine bloata.sapranidis
9d ago
deployf10a3drefactor: optimize product-catalog query batchingm.chen
19d ago
Observability
Scope: {service_name="checkout", k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}
Latency
rpc_server_duration_milliseconds_bucket (histogram): server-side RPC request duration
histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(rpc_server_duration_milliseconds_bucket{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m]))
rpc_client_duration_milliseconds_count (counter): client-side RPC call count
rate(rpc_client_duration_milliseconds_count{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
Throughput
traces_span_metrics_calls_total (counter): total span calls
rate(traces_span_metrics_calls_total{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
rpc_server_responses_per_rpc_count (counter): RPC responses per call
rate(rpc_server_responses_per_rpc_count{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
Custom
go_goroutine_count (counter): number of active goroutines
rate(go_goroutine_count{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
go_config_gogc_percent (gauge): Go GC target percentage
go_config_gogc_percent{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}
Alerts
Service high error rate: warning, for 90s
Service high latency: warning, for 1m
Service traffic spike: warning, for 30s
When this breaks
All purchase flows halt. Checkout is the sole transaction coordinator.[INV-27]
frontend-proxy p99 latency spikes as retries queue; circuit breaker trips within 90s.[INV-26]
19 downstream services lose checkout context: fraud-detection, payment, shipping go idle.[INV-26]
Runbooks & Learnings
📄Checkout investigation: diagnose latency spikes, payment retries, and OOM events via p99 trend + goroutine countRunbook
📄Checkout service lacks Prometheus metrics instrumentation or scraping configuration, preventing o...Learning
📄Memory limit of 20MB insufficient for checkout service workload requiring 18-19MB, causing OOMKil...Learning
Ontology
Ownerbackend● observed
Lifecycleproduction
Criticality
ImportantTIER 2● inferred44%
Readiness
Ready · 100%
owner ✓metrics ✓alerts ✓resilient ✓
Health
No signal yet● unknown

Live health (SLO / error rate / saturation) arrives with the state engine.

Depends On
shipping
● observed
312/min
p99 18ms
email
● observed
198/min
p99 42ms
cart
● observed
1,840/min
p99 9ms
product-catalog
● observed
2,103/min
p99 11ms
otel-collector
● observed
async
p99 n/a
currency
● observed
876/min
p99 7ms
payment
● observed
420/min
p99 134ms
kafka
● observed
async
p99 n/a
flagd
● observed
654/min
p99 3ms
Structure
owned_bydeployment:checkout
100%
● observed
Blast Radius
accountingadcartcurrencyemailflagdfraud-detectionfrontendfrontend-proxyimage-providerkafkaload-generatorotel-collectorpaymentproduct-catalogproduct-reviewsquoterecommendationshipping
observed
Past Incidents
INV-27P1Checkout failing under payment load spike
resolved in 23 min
INV-26P1Checkout unresponsive after OOM kill
resolved in 41 min
INV-22P2ProductCatalogService intermittent UNAVAILABLE
resolved in 1h 12m
INV-20P2Checkout missing Prometheus scrape target
resolved in 55 min
INV-18P2Checkout latency p99 spike on EU traffic
resolved in 38 min
INV-12P3Checkout lacks alerting rule on error rate
resolved in 2h 4m
INV-10P3No SLO defined for checkout success rate
● open
INV-9P3Ownership unset: no team assigned to checkout
● open
Source
Production signals + repos
Manual input
None
Update frequency
Continuous
Maintenance required
Near zero

Deterministic facts. LLM-narrated prose.

The catalog structure, dependencies, readiness, and blast radius come from your system, not from an LLM. The LLM only narrates what it cannot invent: prose about what the facts mean.

Every claim cited.

Known mitigations in the wiki cite actual investigation IDs and change event records. If there is no evidence, the section says so. NOFire AI does not fill in gaps.

Provenance on every dependency.

Each dependency in your catalog carries a provenance label: runtime (observed from DNS/L7 call graphs), synthesized (inferred from patterns), or intent (declared). You see exactly how confident the catalog is.

Agentic era

The developer portal AI agents can actually use.

When a human engineer hits a stale catalog entry, they lose 20 minutes. When a coding agent, deployment agent, or incident response agent hits one, it acts on it. The catalog nobody maintains is now the context layer your entire AI stack runs on.

The stale catalog problem just got a lot more expensive.

NOFire AI reads your GitHub repositories directly, including workflow definitions, contributor history, and release tags. Combined with live production signals, the result is a catalog that is accurate enough for both humans and AI systems to rely on.

README analysisCHANGELOG parsingGitHub integrationCI/CD pipeline readingContributors.mdRelease tagging
checkout-service · agent scanlive · 2026-06-30
entity graphcalls: product-catalog, inventory, payments [runtime, 0.9]
change events14 rollouts in 90d, 2 scaling events
prometheus rules3 SLOs, 7 alerting rules [live fetch]
metric catalog23 linked metrics, selector defined
investigations4 incidents, avg resolution 22 min
resolutions2 known mitigations [cited: INV-12, INV-23]
blast radiusfailure affects: frontend, cart, accounting [pagerank]
README.mdgRPC service, 3 downstream consumers
Catalog coverage

Every layer of service knowledge, observed automatically.

OBSERVED · DEPLOYS + CONTRIBUTORS

Service ownership

NOFire AI agents trace deploy history, on-call patterns, and contributor activity to assign ownership from evidence, not declarations.

OBSERVED · SLOS + ALERTS + ONCALL

Readiness scorecard

Four binary checks: has owner, has metrics, has alerts, is not a single point of failure. Not a score you enter. A score derived from yes/no facts about your actual system.

OBSERVED · CI/CD + INCIDENTS

Change timeline

Every deploy, rollback, and incident appears on the service timeline as it happens. No one logs it manually.

OBSERVED · LIVE TELEMETRY

Blast radius

When a service has a problem, you see exactly which downstream services are at risk, calculated from the observed call graph.

OBSERVED · TRACES + METRICS

Application map

Service dependencies traced from live telemetry. The graph reflects what production is doing right now, not a YAML file from 2022.

OBSERVED · REPOS + PIPELINES

Repository knowledge

NOFire AI agents read README files, CHANGELOG entries, contributor graphs, and CI/CD pipeline definitions to distill architectural context automatically.

OBSERVED · INCIDENT HISTORY

Runbooks and learnings

Past incident resolutions are captured and surfaced on the service page. The catalog gets smarter after every incident.

INFERRED · GRAPH + TRAFFIC

Criticality inference

NOFire AI infers service criticality from dependency depth, traffic patterns, and incident blast radius. No tier spreadsheet required.

How it works

Connect once. Observe continuously.

01

Connect your production signals

Prometheus, distributed traces, deploy events, GitHub or GitLab repositories, and on-call integrations. Most teams are connected in under two hours.

02

Agents observe and synthesize

NOFire AI agents continuously read repos, trace ownership, measure readiness, and calculate blast radius from live production behavior.

03

Your catalog stays current

You read the catalog. You don't write it. As production changes and code evolves, the catalog changes with them. Automatically.

Works withPrometheusDatadogGrafanaGitHubGitLabPagerDutyAWSOpenTelemetry
Blast radius

See what breaks before the incident becomes a crisis.

The blast radius panel shows exactly which services are downstream of the affected service, calculated from the observed call graph. No topology diagrams to maintain. No Slack thread to trace dependencies.

When checkout-service fails, you see that frontend, cart, and accounting are at risk, in seconds, because NOFire AI already traced the call paths from production telemetry.

Blast radius panel showing downstream service impact calculated from observed call graphs in NOFire AI
Detailed comparisons

See how NOFire AI compares to each tool.

Your engineers are maintaining a catalog that is already wrong.

Book a 30-minute session and see your actual service topology, built from what is running in production right now, with no YAML required.

By submitting you agree to our privacy policy.

No commitment. Works with Prometheus, Datadog, GitHub, and GitLab.

Book a demo