Cortex Knows What You Told It.
NOFire AI Knows What Is Real.

Cortex re-evaluates scorecards against metadata your engineers declared. When that metadata drifts, scorecards pass services with no real owner and unknown dependencies. NOFire AI builds the catalog from live signals: what you see is what production is actually doing.

NOFire.ai · Service Wiki
Service wiki
Generated from your environment · observed continuously
1 incident3 warning
Search by service name
CriticalityHealthOwner
⊞ List∿ Graph
frontend-proxywarning
TIER 2productionno owner1 gap
calls 6by 19deploy 1h ago
readiness88%
checkoutwarning
TIER 2productionbackend2 gaps
calls 9by 19deploy 6h ago
readiness44%
fraud-detectionincident
TIER 2productionno owner3 gaps
calls 3by 11deploy 5d ago
readiness31%
product-cataloghealthy
TIER 3productionbackend
calls 3by 14deploy 1d ago
readiness72%
paymenthealthy
TIER 3productionbackend
calls 1by 7deploy 3h ago
readiness90%
cartwarning
TIER 3qabackend2 gaps
calls 2by 8deploy 12h ago
readiness27%
18 services·sorted by criticality·last scan: 4s ago
Trusted by
LearnWorlds Adalat AI Pallma Ergeon Instacar HarborLab
Cortex pain points

Why Cortex customers hit a wall after the first 90 days

Catalog accuracy depends on engineers remembering to update YAML

Every service, team, and domain in Cortex requires a cortex.yaml descriptor. Ownership transfers, dependency changes, and deprecations only appear in the catalog when someone edits that file. YAML goes stale within weeks. Scorecards pass on services with phantom owners and undocumented dependencies.

4-hour scorecard refresh means you are always acting on old data

Cortex re-evaluates scorecards on a 4-hour polling cycle. A service that loses its on-call assignment, drops a Prometheus alert, or gains a new critical downstream dependency is invisible as a readiness failure until the next cycle completes. For on-call engineers investigating active incidents, that lag matters.

The total cost of Cortex developer portal ownership compounds quickly

Cortex licensing is priced per seat. Add implementation and professional services, plus a platform engineer spending 20 to 30 percent of their time on catalog hygiene. Teams under 200 engineers routinely report that the all-in cost of the Cortex developer portal exceeds efficiency gains before the platform reaches critical adoption.

NOFire AI vs Cortex

NOFire AI vs Cortex: what the catalog actually knows

Cortex catalogs from declaration, with a 4-hour lag. NOFire AI catalogs from observation, continuously. One approach has a freshness problem built in.

CapabilityNOFire AICortex
Catalog data sourceObserved from live production: DNS, L7 call graphs, Prometheus rules, CI/CD pipelines, incident historyDeclared in cortex.yaml descriptor files authored and maintained by engineers
Scorecard refresh frequencyContinuous: readiness checks update as production signals changeEvery 4 hours; some integration data refreshes hourly or weekly
Dependency mappingInferred from observed L7 traffic with provenance labels: runtime, synthesized, or intentDeclared explicitly in YAML; undocumented dependencies are invisible
Blast radius calculationPageRank on the live observed call graph, including dependencies from recent service changesDerived from explicitly declared YAML dependencies; only as accurate as what engineers wrote
Ownership assignmentInferred from deploy history, contributor activity, and on-call patternsSet manually in cortex.yaml; drifts silently when teams change without a file edit
Readiness checks4 binary checks from live evidence: has_owner, has_metrics, has_alerts, is_spofScorecard rules evaluated against declared metadata and polled integration data
Time to first valueConnect your stack, catalog appears; no YAML to write, no migration project3-week bootcamp minimum; full catalog population and scorecard configuration takes 3 to 6 months
Ongoing maintenance costNear zero: agents observe continuously; no YAML files to keep currentEstimated 0.25 FTE dedicated to catalog hygiene to prevent descriptor rot
How it works

One panel. Every layer of service knowledge.

The service detail page in NOFire AI is populated entirely from what agents observe: entity graph, change events, Prometheus rules, incident history, and repository analysis. Nothing is declared. Nothing goes stale.

NOFire.ai · checkout · service detail
checkout
v24 · production
No SLO: No SLO / recording rule defined
Important · 1 gap
Overview

The checkout service orchestrates the end-to-end purchase flow, coordinating payment processing, inventory validation, and shipping arrangements. It acts as the central transaction coordinator, calling payment, product-catalog, cart, item validation, shipping, currency, email, kafka, and flagd.

Change timeline
deploya3f91cfeat: add circuit breaker for payment retriesm.chen
2h ago
hotfix7d204bfix: OOM crash at peak load (memory cap 20MB)p.moustafellos
4d ago
configc9e812chore: tune GC percent to reduce goroutine bloata.sapranidis
9d ago
deployf10a3drefactor: optimize product-catalog query batchingm.chen
19d ago
Observability
Scope: {service_name="checkout", k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}
Latency
rpc_server_duration_milliseconds_bucket (histogram): server-side RPC request duration
histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(rpc_server_duration_milliseconds_bucket{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m]))
rpc_client_duration_milliseconds_count (counter): client-side RPC call count
rate(rpc_client_duration_milliseconds_count{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
Throughput
traces_span_metrics_calls_total (counter): total span calls
rate(traces_span_metrics_calls_total{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
rpc_server_responses_per_rpc_count (counter): RPC responses per call
rate(rpc_server_responses_per_rpc_count{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
Custom
go_goroutine_count (counter): number of active goroutines
rate(go_goroutine_count{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}[5m])
go_config_gogc_percent (gauge): Go GC target percentage
go_config_gogc_percent{service_name="checkout",k8s_namespace_name="otel-demo"}
Alerts
Service high error rate: warning, for 90s
Service high latency: warning, for 1m
Service traffic spike: warning, for 30s
When this breaks
All purchase flows halt. Checkout is the sole transaction coordinator.[INV-27]
frontend-proxy p99 latency spikes as retries queue; circuit breaker trips within 90s.[INV-26]
19 downstream services lose checkout context: fraud-detection, payment, shipping go idle.[INV-26]
Runbooks & Learnings
📄Checkout investigation: diagnose latency spikes, payment retries, and OOM events via p99 trend + goroutine countRunbook
📄Checkout service lacks Prometheus metrics instrumentation or scraping configuration, preventing o...Learning
📄Memory limit of 20MB insufficient for checkout service workload requiring 18-19MB, causing OOMKil...Learning
Ontology
Ownerbackend● observed
Lifecycleproduction
Criticality
ImportantTIER 2● inferred44%
Readiness
Ready · 100%
owner ✓metrics ✓alerts ✓resilient ✓
Health
No signal yet● unknown

Live health (SLO / error rate / saturation) arrives with the state engine.

Depends On
shipping
● observed
312/min
p99 18ms
email
● observed
198/min
p99 42ms
cart
● observed
1,840/min
p99 9ms
product-catalog
● observed
2,103/min
p99 11ms
otel-collector
● observed
async
p99 n/a
currency
● observed
876/min
p99 7ms
payment
● observed
420/min
p99 134ms
kafka
● observed
async
p99 n/a
flagd
● observed
654/min
p99 3ms
Structure
owned_bydeployment:checkout
100%
● observed
Blast Radius
accountingadcartcurrencyemailflagdfraud-detectionfrontendfrontend-proxyimage-providerkafkaload-generatorotel-collectorpaymentproduct-catalogproduct-reviewsquoterecommendationshipping
observed
Past Incidents
INV-27P1Checkout failing under payment load spike
resolved in 23 min
INV-26P1Checkout unresponsive after OOM kill
resolved in 41 min
INV-22P2ProductCatalogService intermittent UNAVAILABLE
resolved in 1h 12m
INV-20P2Checkout missing Prometheus scrape target
resolved in 55 min
INV-18P2Checkout latency p99 spike on EU traffic
resolved in 38 min
INV-12P3Checkout lacks alerting rule on error rate
resolved in 2h 4m
INV-10P3No SLO defined for checkout success rate
● open
INV-9P3Ownership unset: no team assigned to checkout
● open
Source
Production signals + repos
Manual input
None
Update frequency
Continuous
Maintenance required
Near zero

Deterministic facts. LLM-narrated prose.

The catalog structure, dependencies, readiness, and blast radius come from your system, not from an LLM. The LLM only narrates what it cannot invent: prose about what the facts mean.

Every claim cited.

Known mitigations cite actual investigation IDs and change event records. If there is no evidence, the section says so. NOFire AI does not fill in gaps.

Provenance on every dependency.

Each dependency carries a label: runtime (observed from DNS/L7 call graphs), synthesized (inferred), or intent (declared). You see exactly how confident the catalog is.

Setup

Connect your stack. Your catalog appears.

No migration project. No catalog entries to write. No plugins to configure.

01

Connect your signals

Link your observability stack, Kubernetes, CI/CD, and incident tooling. NOFire AI starts reading your entity graph and change history immediately.

02

Agents distill knowledge

Deterministic extractors build a structured skeleton: ownership, dependencies with provenance, readiness checks, blast radius. No LLM invents facts.

03

Catalog stays current

Every deploy, incident, rollback, and ownership change is reflected automatically. Engineers read the catalog instead of maintaining it.

Integrates withPrometheusGrafanaDatadogKubernetesGitHubGitLabPagerDutyLokiTempo
Also comparing
FAQ

Switching from Cortex

How does NOFire AI compare to Cortex for production readiness scorecards?

Cortex scorecards re-evaluate every 4 hours from YAML-declared metadata. NOFire AI readiness checks run continuously against observed production facts: has_owner (inferred from deploy history and on-call), has_metrics (live Prometheus rule check), has_alerts (live alerting rule check), is_spof (inferred from dependency graph PageRank). No declarations required.

Does NOFire AI replace Cortex for service ownership tracking?

Yes. Cortex assigns ownership via the cortex.yaml owner field, which drifts when teams change. NOFire AI infers ownership from deploy history, contributor activity, and on-call rotation patterns with a provenance label (runtime, synthesized, or intent). Ownership stays current without anyone editing a file.

How do I replace Cortex without losing our existing scorecard configuration?

NOFire AI builds readiness checks from observed production facts rather than declared rules. The transition takes under 30 minutes to connect your observability stack. Existing catalog data does not need to migrate: NOFire AI discovers services and infers their state from live signals.

Is NOFire AI more affordable than the Cortex developer portal?

Cortex is priced per seat with additional professional services and implementation costs. NOFire AI also requires no dedicated catalog-hygiene headcount, which at a 0.25 FTE maintenance burden represents a significant cost reduction for most teams. Contact us for pricing details.

Replace Cortex with a catalog that reflects production, not declarations.

No cortex.yaml to maintain. No 4-hour scorecard delay. NOFire AI reads your production signals and builds a catalog your on-call can trust.

By submitting you agree to our privacy policy.

Book a demo